There is unlikely to be a clear moment when we emerge as transhuman.

Compassion alone is not enough.īut there is a darker side to the naive faith that Pearce and other proponents have in transhumanism – one that is decidedly dystopian. If we want eternal life, then we’ll need to rewrite our bug-ridden genetic code and become god-like … only hi-tech solutions can ever eradicate suffering from the world. If we want to live in paradise, we will have to engineer it ourselves. If the history of technological progress can be seen as humankind’s attempt to tame nature to better serve its needs, transhumanism is the logical continuation: the revision of humankind’s nature to better serve its fantasies.Īs David Pearce, a leading proponent of transhumanism and co-founder of Humanity+, says: “Transhumanism” is the idea that humans should transcend their current natural state and limitations through the use of technology – that we should embrace self-directed human evolution. Advances in one area often raise new possibilities in others, and this “convergence” may bring about radical changes to our world in the near-future.

Nanobots could roam our bloodstream to monitor our health and enhance our emotional propensities for joy, love or other emotions. We could use brain-computer interfaces to link us to advanced artificial intelligence (AI).

They may enable us to enjoy greater “morphological freedom” – we could take on new forms through prosthetics or genetic engineering. Disease, ageing and even death are all human realities that these technologies seek to end. The rapid development of so-called NBIC technologies – nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science – are giving rise to possibilities that have long been the domain of science fiction.

Limitlessness casino